Legal Opinion
GOLDSICH v. City of Hartford
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 16, 2008No. Civ. 3:06CV00628 (AWT)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Matthew Goldsich (“Goldsich”) brings this action against Clear Channel Entertainment, Inc. (“Clear Channel”) and Jim Koplik (“Koplik”), alleging negligence and violations of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn. Gen.Stat. § 42-110a et seq. (“CUTPA”), in Count Twelve and Count Thirteen, respectively, of the Second Amended Complaint. Clear Channel and Koplik have moved for summary judgment on both of these counts. For the reasons set forth below, their motion is being granted.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Shelley Weinstock v. Columbia UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aviles v. Wayside Auto Body, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Traylor v. AwwaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Carl v. EdwardsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Miller v. Toyota Motor CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009