Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tome

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 3, 1986No. 81 Civ. 1836 (MP)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge.

Evidentiary Rulings

During the course of the non-jury trial herein, motions were presented by the parties for evidentiary rulings on which decision was reserved. The questions raised by the parties relate to the effect to be given to defendant Tome’s assertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and to the admissibility of portions of depositions and other exhibits submitted as evidence.

A. The Effect of Tome’s Assertion of His Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-Incrimination

The plaintiff SEC sought to obtain responses…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. InadiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lefkowitz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States Ex Rel. Bilokumsky v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Dirks v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James Earle v. Robert BenoitCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family of La Cosa NostraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  3. State of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GasawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. SumanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. TomeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API