Legal Opinion
Gledhill v. Fisher & Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 1935No. Docket No. 84, Calendar No. 38,194PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
The Wesbrook-Lane Properties Corporation, whose name was subsequently changed to United Bealty & Construction Company, was formed for lawful purposes, including the purchasing, holding and dealing in real estate. Its entire original capital was supplied, and its entire stock owned, by the New Center Development Corporation, which under the law of Michigan had the legal right to hold the stock. All of the original capital of the New Center Development Corporation was in turn supplied by Fisher & Company, which owns the stock of the New Center Development Corporation, All three corporations…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- J. J. McCaskill Co v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Donnell v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Seasword v. Hilti, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Servo Kinetics, Inc. v. Tokyo Precision Instruments Co. Ltd. Moog, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Beale v. Kappa Alpha OrderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Herman v. Mobile Homes Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.