Legal Opinion

Donnell v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 3, 1908No. 106PublishedCited by 90 opinions

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. The facts'are stated in the opinion. .

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice. Holmes

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was brought in the Superior Court of Cook County; Illinois, by the Hall Safe and Lock Company against' the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company, and was removed by the latter to the United States Circuit Court. The bill sought to enjoin the defendant from representing itself to be the successor of the Hall Safe and Lock Company and otherwise, as need not be stated in detail. The defendant answered, denying the plaintiff’s rights and setting up its own. At the same time it'filed a cfoss-bill to which it made the petitioner Donnell,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Hall Safe & Lock Co. v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1906

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Klein v. Board of Tax Supervisors of Jefferson Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API