Legal Opinion

Seasword v. Hilti, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1995No. Docket Nos. 95069, 95070, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, C.J.

This case involves liability of a nonmanufacturing seller for personal injuries that plaintiff Eric Seasword sustained while using a drill that is alleged to have been negligently designed. Plaintiff seeks recovery from defendant Hilti, Inc., on the basis of Hilti, Inc.’s, status as: (1) the nonmanufacturing seller or distributor of the drill (seller theory), (2) the apparent manufacturer of the drill, or (3) the subsidiary corporation of the manufacturer of the drill.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether the Court of Appeals erred by affirming the summary disposition of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Burkert v. Petrol Plus of Naugatuck, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Dudley Sports Co. v. SchmittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Gledhill v. Fisher & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Tice v. Wilmington Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Anwar v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. Servo Kinetics, Inc. v. Tokyo Precision Instruments Co. Ltd. Moog, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC v. Great Lakes Grain, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  4. Llewellyn-Jones v. Metro Property Group, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  5. Green v. ZiegelmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API