Legal Opinion

Bell v. Walton

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 30, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

[¶ 1] Chad Walton appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Pe-nobscot County, Mead, J.) finding that strict compliance with the written notice requirement of 31 M.R.S.A. § 692(3) (1996) was necessary to effectuate Bryan Bell’s voluntary withdrawal from their limited liability company, Bangor Metal Works, *688LLC. The court determined that Bell remained a fully vested member/manager of the company and was entitled to an equal distribution of the profits upon its ordered dissolution. Walton argues that strict compliance with the statutory written notice requirement is not necessary to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Mut. Ins. Companies v. MurraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. State v. ShepleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  3. Hallowell National Bank v. MarstonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1893
  4. Seider v. Board of Examiners of PsychologistsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. Darling'sSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  2. Victor Sunshine v. Stephen M. BrettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. Victor Sunshine v. Stephen M. BrettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API