Legal Opinion
Chandoke v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 2, 1994No. Civ. 91-1460PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge:
Presently before the court is the motion of defendant, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (“ABI”) for partial summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is denied.
I. Factual Background
Born in India, and a United States citizen since 1988, plaintiff Surinder Chandoke (“plaintiff,” or “Chandoke”) alleges that ABI committed racial and national origin discrimination when it rejected his job application. Deposition Transcript of Surinder Chandoke [hereinafter “Chandoke dep.”] at 14-15.
On March 5, 1989, ABI ran an advertisement in the Philadelphia…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Saint Francis College v. Al-KhazrajiSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wesley v. Palace Rehabilitation & Care Center, L.L.C.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Chellen v. John Pickle Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2006
- Ihekwu v. City of Durham, NCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2000
- Chellen v. John Pickle Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2006
- Keeler v. Brenntag Specialties, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.