Legal Opinion

Scott v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1935PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiee Justice Green

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a suit by the beneficiary of a life insurance policy to recover the additional indemnity provided by that contract in case the death of the insured resulted “directly and independently of all other causes,” “solely through external, violent, and accidental means.”

The declaration contains the following averment of the circumstances of the insured’s death:

“The plaintiff further alleges that on or about July 24, 1934, the deceased, John Clayton, the insured under the above described insurance policy, suffered death from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Stone v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HayTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  4. McFarland v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Hahn v. Home Life Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Travelers Ins. Co. v. AnsleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  3. Seeley v. Pilot Fire & Casualty CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Adkins v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Bukata v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API