Legal Opinion
Stone v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1915PublishedCited by 29 opinions
FROM HAMILTON Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County — W. B. Garvin, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fancher
delivered the opinion of the Court..
Complainant sued to recover under the terms of a policy which was to insure him against bodily injury sustained during the term of one year, through accidental means, and resulting directly, independently, *674and exclusively of all other canses, in immediate, continuous, and total disability. The injury complained of is stated as follows:
“Complainant would now show the court that some time in November, 1913, he went to Nashville, Tennessee, to attend the football game between Vanderbilt and Sewanee; that the day was rather cool, and the ground was rather damp;…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Atlanta Accident Ass'n v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Horsfall v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- McGlinchey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
- Smith v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Evans v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- M. R. Thomason, Contractor, a Partnership Composed of M. R. Thomason, D. B. Holt, Jr., and Others v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Northam v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Kendall v. Travelers' Protective Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1918
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.