Legal Opinion
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Seefeld
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 29, 1991No. C4-90-2612PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Appellant challenges the declaratory judgment that a homeowner’s insurance policy provides coverage for injuries sustained by respondent in an all-terrain vehicle accident. Respondents seek review of the trial court’s conclusion that the utility trailer towed by the all-terrain vehicle was a motor vehicle as defined in the insurance policy. We reverse.
FACTS
Appellant State Farm Insurance Companies (State Farm) insured respondent Gary Seefeld under a homeowner’s liability insurance policy covering his mobile home. In June 1985, his daughter, respondent Kelly Seefeld, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Tlougan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. CamaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Farm Insurance Companies v. SeefeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Christie v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchmittCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Vann v. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002