Legal Opinion

Vann v. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 2002No. 33A01-0203-CV-98Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellants-Plaintiffs, Douglas and Michelle Vann (the “Vanns”), appeal the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Appellee-Third-Party Defendant, United Farm Family Insurance Company (“Farm Bureau”).

We reverse.

ISSUE

The Vanns raise one issue for review which we restate as follows: whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Farm Bureau under the terms of its Rural Guardian Policy (the “Policy”) issued to Defendanb-Third-Party Plaintiff, Walter Upchurch (Upchurch). 1

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On April 27, 1999,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. American States Insurance Co. v. KigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bosecker v. Westfield InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. WOERNER, ETC. v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Meridian Mutual Insurance v. Auto-Owners InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. General Housewares Corp. v. National Surety Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API