Legal Opinion
In Re Pieter Kramer
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 17, 1991No. 90-1369UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
925 F.2d 1479
18 U.S.P.Q.2d 1415
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
In re Pieter KRAMER
No. 90-1369.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Jan. 17, 1991.
Before RICH, PAULINE NEWMAN and PLAGER, Circuit Judges.
DECISION
RICH,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Grain Processing Corporation v. American Maize-Products Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- In re KellerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- In Re Lucas S. Gordon and Karl M. SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Damaso (Roman C.) v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- Koninklijke Philips Electronics N v. v. Cinram International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010