Legal Opinion
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N v. v. Cinram International, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 4, 2010No. 08 Civ 00515(RGS), 08 Civ 04068(RGS), 08 Civ 04070(RGS), 08 Civ 04071(RGS), 08 Civ 07351(RGS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
RICHARD G. STEARNS, District Judge. 1
The patent in suit, U.S. Patent No. 5,068,846 ('846 Patent), entitled “Reflective, Optical Record Carrier,” was issued to Pieter Kramer, the former head of the optical research group at plaintiff Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., on November 26, 1991. 2 The '846 patent is directed to a record carrier for video and/or audio information. Before the court are the parties’ briefs on claim construction. The court held a claim construction hearing in the Southern District of New York on December 2, 2009, and a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Vivid Technologies, Inc. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Latex Allergen Reduction, LLC v. Dynarex Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011