Pipeliners Union 798, United Ass'n v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
In this appeal we are asked to decide whether the superior court erred in entering a judgment to enforce a back pay order issued by the Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (“the Commission”) when an appeal of that order was pending before another superior court judge. We conclude that the two actions should have been consolidated; accordingly, we remand the case.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 1976, several individuals filed administrative complaints with the Commission, alleging that the Pipeliners Union 798, United Association (“the Union”) had…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Owsichek v. State, Guide Licensing & Control BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Liberty National Insurance Company v. EberhartAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
- Wise Mechanical Contractors v. BignellAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Fedpac International, Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- E. W. Montgomery Co. v. GwinDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Nome v. Catholic Bishop of Northern AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Keane v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Crawford & Co. v. Baker-WithrowAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Crawford & Co. v. Baker-WithrowAlaska Supreme Court · 2003