Legal Opinion
Crawford & Co. v. Baker-Withrow
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 2003No. S-10141Published
1Opinion of the Court
81 P.3d 982 (2003)
CRAWFORD & COMPANY and National Union Fire Ins. Co. Pittsburgh, Appellants,
v.
Penny T.R. BAKER-WITHROW, Appellee.
No. S-10141.
Supreme Court of Alaska.
December 19, 2003.
Zane D. Wilson, Cook, Schuhmann & Groseclose, Inc., Fairbanks, for Appellant Crawford & Company.
Penny Baker-Withrow, pro se, North Pole.
Before: FABE, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, EASTAUGH, BRYNER, and CARPENETI, Justices.
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
Alaska Statute 23.30.155(o) requires the Alaska Workers' Compensation Board to notify the Division of Insurance when it determines that an insurer has frivolously or…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Smither and Company, Inc. v. Franciska T. ColesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Calvin Geyen, Jr. v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.