Legal Opinion

Neylan v. Vorwald

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 8, 1984No. 82-2051, 82-2052PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBablitch, J.

These consolidated appeals are from identical orders denying the plaintiff-appellants’ motion for trial and to set aside orders dismissing their related personal injury actions for want of prosecution. The *483orders of dismissal were entered, without notice to the parties or their counsel, more than four years before the motion was made. The parties received no notice that the orders had been entered, and continued trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Because we conclude that the orders of dismissal were void, and that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to vacate them,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Latham v. Casey & King Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Trispel v. HaeferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Neylan v. VorwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State Ex Rel. Coleman v. McCaughtryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Rupert v. Home Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  4. Tridle v. HornCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  5. State v. BatistaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API