Legal Opinion

Rudeen v. Cenarrusa

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2001No. 26975, 26976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

Appellants appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Respondents Kent Rudeen, et al. (Rudeen), which found the Idaho Term Limits Act of 1994 unconstitutional. We reverse.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

An initiative establishing term limits for elected “federal, state, county, municipal and school district officials” (Term Limits Act) appeared on the ballot at the general election held in Idaho on November 8, 1994. The effect of the Term Limits Act is to prohibit the names of certain incumbents from appearing on the ballot. Fifty-nine percent…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Maher v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Norman v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Friel v. Boise City Housing AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cathcart v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. McLean v. Maverik Country Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Cole v. State Ex Rel. BrownMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Alpine Village Co. v. City of McCallIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Babe Vote/League of Women Voters of Idaho v. McGraneIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API