Van Dyke v. . Atlantic Greyhound Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
DeviN, ,J.
The principal question presented by this appeal is addressed to the correctness of the ruling of the court below in allowing the motion .for judgment of nonsuit. This renders it necessary to examine the evidence upon which plaintiff’s asserted right to maintain his action depends, and to consider this evidence in the light most favorable for him.
Plaintiff’s intestate, a boy 14 years of age, on the morning of 25 August, 1939, was riding a bicycle on the highway near the corporate limits of the city of Henderson, proceeding eastwardly on the Louisburg Road. The day was clear and the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Redmon v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Meredith v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Tart Ex Rel. Tart v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Wade Ex Rel. Wade v. Jones Sausage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. MattoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Welch Ex Rel. Johnson v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Maddox v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.