Legal Opinion

McNatt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 2006No. PD-0133-05PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeller, P.J.

PRICE, WOMACK, KEASLER, HERVEY, HOLCOMB and COCHRAN JJ., joined.

Appellant’s sentence was reversed on appeal, after the Court of Appeals found that the State failed to give appellant proper notice of its intent to use a prior conviction for enhancement purposes. The case was remanded for a new trial on punishment only. We granted review to determine whether the State is prohibited on remand from giving the requisite notice and using the conviction for enhancement purposes at the new punishment hearing. We hold that there is no such prohibition.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Trial

Appellant was indicted on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Chandler v. Warden FretagSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Tamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hughen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  2. Torres v. Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
  3. Antonio Philande Nelson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  4. Cynthia Larue White v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2019
  5. Demarcus Lamond Lewis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API