Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Miller
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided September 22, 2010No. AP-76,167PublishedCited by 130 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.
in which MEYERS, PRICE, WOMACK, JOHNSON and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined.
In this habeas corpus proceeding, applicant claims that both his trial and appellate attorneys provided ineffective assistance of counsel that prejudiced his rights.1 The habeas judge made findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation that this Court grant relief. We accept the habeas judge’s findings of fact, but we disagree with some of his legal conclusions. Based on the habeas judge’s factual findings and the applicable law, we conclude that applicant is not entitled to relief on his ineffective…
3Cases cited54 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by130 opinions
- Flores, Ex Parte GerardoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Ex parte SaenzCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Rodney Wayne Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Wise v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Kory Nelson Turner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.