Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Wolverton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 6, 1928No. 28,234PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This is another chapter in litigation which has already received this court’s attention. See Hartman v. Wolverton, 125 Kan. 202, 263 Pac. 789, where the facts are so comprehensively stated that they need not now be repeated.

The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law adverse to defendant and granted a permanent injunction against his violation of the restrictive clause of the deed under which the property had been conveyed to him.

Defendant appeals for the purpose of getting this court to explain the meaning of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartman v. WolvertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nash v. ConnellCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  2. Maurer v. J. C. Nichols Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  3. N. P. Dodge Corp. v. CalderwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Reeves v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. Welsh v. FloSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API