Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Lodzinski

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 5, 1937PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBodine, J.

The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company on February 21st, 1935, filed a bill of complaint in the court of chancery seeking to cancel, because of the insured’s fraud, the procurement of two certain policies on the life of Bertha T. Lodzinski, now deceased. One of the policies was issued February 21st, 1933, and the learned vice-chancellor, relying upon the case of Travelers Insurance Co. v. Leonard, 120 N. J. Eq. 6, concluded that the suit upon this policy was not begun within the limits of the incontestability clause. That clause is as follows: “This policy shall be incontestable after it has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. YatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Shalvoy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Paul Revere Life Insurance v. HaasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. Pioneer National Title Insurance Co. v. LucasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. Franklin Life Insurance Company v. Mary E. Bieniek and Sewickley Savings & Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  4. Silbros, Inc. v. SolomonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  5. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. LodzinskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API