Legal Opinion

Pilgrim Coat, Apron, C., Inc. v. Krzywulak

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 20, 1948No. Docket 147/359PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Neither modern public policy nor the judicial decisions of recent years have proscribed contracts in restraint of trade between employer and employee where the restraint is reasonably necessary for the protection of the business of the employer and not unreasonably restrictive in point of time or territory upon the normal rights of the employee. Silbros, Inc., v. Solomon,139 N.J. Eq. 528; 52 Atl. Rep. 2d 534, and cases therein collated.

The primary factors to be considered in testing the validity and efficacy of such a covenant are whether the covenant ancillary to the contract has a greater…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ideal Laundry Co. v. GugliemoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  2. A. Fink Sons v. GoldbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Irvington Varnish & Insulator Co. v. Van NordeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  4. Silbros, Inc. v. SolomonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  5. Credit Rating Service, Inc. v. CharlesworthNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mills v. MurrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Solari Industries, Inc. v. MaladySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Ryska v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  4. RL GUTTRIDGE, INC. v. WeanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. Rubel & Jensen Corp. v. RubelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API