Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 22, 2013No. 11-1149PublishedCited by 253 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Gray Peterson, a resident of Washington, applied for a concealed handgun license (“CHL”) from the ex officio sheriff of Denver, Colorado. Pursuant to state law, Colorado sheriffs may issue CHLs only to state residents. Colo.Rev.Stat. § 18-12-203(l)(a). Peterson’s application was accordingly denied, prompting Peterson to file suit against the Denver sheriff and Colorado’s executive director of the Department of Public Safety. Peterson claims that Colorado’s policy with respect to non-resident CHL applicants violates the Second Amendment, the Privileges and Immunities…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by253 opinions
- Punt v. Kelly ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Drake v. FilkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Williams v. Utah Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Raymond Woollard v. Denis GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Patel v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.