Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Maynard
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1996No. 94-7108PublishedCited by 202 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Carl Demetrius Mitchell brought suit against fourteen prison officials and employees for violations of his Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 The district court initially dismissed his complaint as frivolous. Following an appeal, we reversed the district court’s ruling and remanded the case for trial. Mitchell v. Maynard, No. 92-7066, 1992 WL 401593 (10th Cir. Dec. 23, 1992). On remand, a jury trial was held on Mr. Mitchell’s claims, but prior to jury deliberation, the district court granted the appellees judgment as a…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by202 opinions
- Mata v. SaizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Burke v. RegaladoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Mitchell v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Towerridge, Inc., Sued as United States of America for the Benefit of Towerridge, Inc., and v. T.A.O., Inc., and Mid-Continent Casualty Co., AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
197 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.