Legal Opinion

Strandberg v. Stringer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1923No. 17149PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered September 14, 1921, in favor of the defendants, notwithstanding the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for conversion.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

On February 11,1920, the appellant, Strandberg, being then indebted to the Mount Vernon National Bank in the sum of $1,600, represented by two promissory notes, executed and delivered to the bank a chattel mortgage upon a certain lot of potatoes *359then in dry storage at the Bell Street Dock, in Seattle, King county, Washington. The mortgagor duly filed the mortgage for record with the county auditor of King county on February 13, 1920. ‘Some few days after the execution of the mortgage, the mortgagor left the state of Washington for the territory of Alaska, and did not return to the state until…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coffee v. HaynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. High v. Bank of CommerceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Allen v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. City of Seattle v. DoranWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. White v. PowersWashington Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Haggerty v. Sherburne Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Pappas v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State ex rel. Southern Alaska Canning Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Harrison v. DaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
  5. Yeatman v. PatricianWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API