Legal Opinion
Oster v. Medtronic, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 23, 1988No. C7-87-2366PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
This appeal is from a trial court’s ruling requiring a contractor to indemnify a construction manager for the construction manager’s own negligence. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1979, Medtronic, Inc. (Medtronic) contracted with Construction Analysis and Management, Inc. (CAM) to have CAM act as the construction manager of a project aimed at building an addition onto one of Medtronic’s buildings. CAM’s duties included preparing contracts between Med-tronic and other trade contractors and supervising the overall operation of the construction project. Kastner & Sons, Inc. (Kastner),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Braegelmann v. Horizon Development Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Johnson v. McGough Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Anstine v. Lake Darling Ranch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Lawton v. JoestingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Fossum v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- National Hydro Systems v. M.A. Mortenson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Thomsen v. Famous Dave's of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Concord & Cumberland Horizontal Prop. Regime v. Concord & Cumberland, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- East-Harding, Inc. v. Horace A. Piazza & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
- In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond LitigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.