Legal Opinion
In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond Litigation
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 29, 1994No. C6-93-2254, C4-93-2253 and C0-93-2251PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Respondents, bondholders in the construction of a recycling facility (the bondholders), commenced the present action against appellants Hennepin County (the county) and Hennepin Energy Resource Company Limited Partnership (HERC), alleging breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and various fraud claims. The bondholders’ claims arise from allegations that the county and HERC wrongfully prevented renewal of a letter of credit, thus triggering redemption of the bonds. On appeal: (1) the county contends the district court erred…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Nordling v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Blattner v. ForsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Environmental Products Corporation v. King Companies, Incorporated Rvm Leasing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995