Legal Opinion

Concord & Cumberland Horizontal Prop. Regime v. Concord & Cumberland, LLC

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 8, 2018No. Appellate Case No. 2016-000076; Opinion No. 5585PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.:

**642This case involves the alleged negligent construction of a condominium project in Charleston, which resulted in numerous construction defects. Appellant Superior Construction Corporation (Superior) appeals the circuit court's partial grant of summary judgment in favor of Respondent The Muhler Company, Inc. (Muhler), arguing the circuit court erred by misconstruing its argument and finding the relevant contracts between the parties did not require Muhler to indemnify Superior for Superior's own concurrent negligence. We affirm.

FACTS

The plaintiff, Concord and Cumberland…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ethyl Corp. v. Daniel Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Vermeer Carolina's, Inc. v. Wood/Chuck Chipper Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Payne Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Bob McKiness Excavating & Grading, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  5. Town of Winnsboro v. Wiedeman-Singleton, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. LittleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
  2. Hazel v. Blitz United Statesa., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  3. Builders FirstSource-Southeast Group, LLC v. Palmetto Trim and RenovationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025
  4. Builders FirstSource-Southeast Group, LLC v. Palmetto Trim and RenovationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025
  5. Builders FirstSource-Southeast Group, LLC v. Palmetto Trim and RenovationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API