Legal Opinion

Ogle v. Nooth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 30, 2013No. 10108394P; A148493PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his formal petition for post-conviction relief. Petitioner argues that the post-conviction court erred when it granted the state’s motion to dismiss his petition for failing to attach “[affidavits, records or other documentary evidence supporting the allegations of the petition,” as required by ORS 138.580. We agree with petitioner and, therefore, reverse and remand.

A jury convicted petitioner of second-degree assault constituting domestic violence, possession of methamphetamine, and two counts of endangering the welfare of a minor. The trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Stanley v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Billings v. GatesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Young v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Horn v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ogle v. NoothOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. PalomoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Cavitt v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Tolle v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Ellett v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API