State v. Palomo

Defendant was serving probation as a result of a prior conviction when she was convicted of prostitution, ORS 167.007. She appeals the judgment of conviction for prostitution and an amended judgment of probation violation in the prior case based on the prostitution conviction. She challenges her prostitution conviction, contending, among other things, that the trial court erred in denying her motion for judgment of acquittal (MJOA).1 Defendant further contends that, because the trial court erred in convicting her of prostitution, it erred in concluding that she had violated the probation that…