Legal Opinion

United States v. Kathy Klingler

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 19, 1995No. 94-1211PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

Kathy Klingler appeals her conviction for converting money of the United States pursuant to a conditional guilty plea, claiming that the district court erred in denying her motion to dismiss the indictment. We reverse the district court’s decision because the misappropriated funds never became “money of the United States” or a “thing of value of the United States,” as required by 18 U.S.C. § 641 and 649.

I

Kathy Klingler was a customs broker, licensed by the United States Customs Service to facilitate the entry of goods into this country. The Customs Service detains goods…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert SuarezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Jose Antonio Caseslorente,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Dana Nessel v. Enbridge Energy, LPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  5. United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API