Legal Opinion
Opinion No. (2006)
California Attorney General Reports
Decided December 1, 2006Published
1Opinion of the Court
BILL LOCKYER Attorney General GREGORY L. GONOT Deputy Attorney General
THE HONORABLE KEITH RICHMAN, MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, has requested an opinion on the following question:
May the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System extend the payment schedule for retroactive benefits beyond the average remaining work period of the employees eligible to receive the benefits without violating the board's constitutional duties to provide secure benefits to its members, minimize costs to employers, assure the competency of the assets of the retirement system, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Valdes v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Board of Administration v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- City of Huntington Beach v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Oakland v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.