Wilhelm v. Gray
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
766 P.2d 1357 (1988)
Christopher David WILHELM, Appellant,
v.
Dan GRAY, Court Clerk of Oklahoma County, Appellee.
No. 61296.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
December 6, 1988.
As Corrected February 14, 1989.
Robert K. McCune, Stipe, Gossett, Stipe, Harper, Estes, McCune & Parks, Oklahoma City, for appellant.
Phyllis L. Walta, Asst. Dist. Atty., Oklahoma City, for appellee.
SIMMS, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of the district court dismissing plaintiff/appellant's cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, because an adequate remedy under state law exists for redress of plaintiff's claim. AFFIRMED.
The relevant…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Kauger; Dissent · Kauger; Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.