Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Saumer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1999No. 99-832PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Generally, neglect of legal matters and a failure to cooperate in the ensuing investigation warrant an indefinite suspension. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Rollins (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 408, 410, 704 N.E.2d 1210, 1211. There are no circumstances that require a departure from the foregoing rule in this case. As the board concluded, respondent’s concealment of assets, neglect, and abandonment of the estate case compounded by his total lack of cooperation with and respect for the disciplinary process require an indefinite suspension.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n. v. RollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lake County Bar Ass'n v. RozancOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. SaumerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SaumerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. SaumerOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API