Disciplinary Counsel v. Saumer

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 312.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SAUMER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Saumer,

1999-Ohio-107.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Concealing assets of an estate—Neglect of an entrusted legal matter—Abandonment of an estate case—Neglecting or refusing to assist or testify in a disciplinary investigation. (No. 99-832—Submitted June 9, 1999—Decided August 25, 1999.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 98-40. __________________ {¶…