Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Saumer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 2002No. 01-1578PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

On August 25, 1999, we indefinitely suspended respondent, James Clark Saumer, now residing in North Olmsted, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0016680, from the practice of law for neglecting and abandoning cases in probate court Disciplinary Counsel v. Saumer (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 312, 715 N.E.2d 124. On December 4, 2000, relator, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, filed a complaint charging that respondent, by neglecting three other matters, again violated the Code of Professional Responsibility. Respondent failed to answer, and relator’s motion for default was referred to Master Commissioner…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SaumerOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. SaumerOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API