Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Saumer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2002No. 2001-1578Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 329.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SAUMER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Saumer,

2002-Ohio-887.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice—Engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law—Neglect of an entrusted legal matter—Failing to carry out contract for professional employment— Failing to promptly deliver to client funds or property to which the client is entitled—Neglecting or refusing to assist or testify in a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SaumerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SaumerOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API