Claude Grant v. Metropolitan Gov't of Nashville
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge.
In this class action lawsuit alleging racial discrimination, the district court entered judgment for Plaintiffs after a bench trial on their disparate impact claims. Because we find that Plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of disparate impact liability, we reverse.
I
Nine named plaintiffs filed this class action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) against Defendant>-Appellant Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee (“Metro”). The named plaintiffs are current and former employees of Metro Water…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jones v. CarusoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- William Howe v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Davis v. Cintas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- William Howe v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Swann v. Time Warner Entertainment Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- Waldon v. Cincinnati Public SchoolsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.