Legal Opinion
Waldon v. Cincinnati Public Schools
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 3, 2015No. Case No. 1:12-cv-677PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 43) AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 44)
TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.
This civil action is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions: 1) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 43), *946Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition (Doc. 51), and Defendant’s Reply (Doc. 59); and 2) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 44), Defendant’s Response (Doc. 52), and Plaintiffs’ Reply (Doc. 58).
I. BACKGROUND FACTS
Plaintiffs were both long-term and valued employees of Defendant Cincinnati…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Swann v. Time Warner Entertainment Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- Henderson v. Vision Property Management, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Iowa Ass'n of Business & Industry v. City of Waterloo, The Waterloo Commission on Human Rights, and Martin M. Peterson, in His Official CapacitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
- Iowa Ass'n of Business & Industry v. City of Waterloo, The Waterloo Commission on Human Rights, and Martin M. Peterson, in His Official CapacitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
- REESE v. SOURCE 4 TEACHERSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.