Legal Opinion
Davis v. Cintas Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 30, 2013No. 10-1662PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
Tanesha Davis sued Cintas Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of female job applicants denied employment as entry-level sales representatives. She alleged that Cintas’s hiring practices led to gender discrimination, in violation of Title VII, and caused Cintas to reject her application for employment twice. The district court denied Davis’s motion for class certi fication, and ultimately granted summary judgment for Cintas on her individual claims. Davis appeals. We affirm the district court’s denial of class certification. We also affirm its grant…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Gina Glazer v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Quinton Brown v. Nucor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Robert Deleon v. Kalamazoo County Road Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Shazor v. Professional Transit Management, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Hummel, D. v. Walmart Stores, Inc, ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.