Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission of Missouri v. Hammel

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 11, 1963No. 49590PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COIL, Commissioner.

In this condemnation case Erwin F. Vet-ter has appealed from a judgment (designated final for appeal purposes) striking his amended answer and dismissing his amended counterclaim. Respondent, the State Highway Commission of Missouri, hereinafter sometimes called the commission, filed its petition on September 28, 1954, seeking to condemn several parcels of land located in St. Louis County “for new State Highway Route 40.” It was averred that one tract was owned by Emil Waibel and that Erwin F. Vetter had an interest in said land as the trustee in a deed of trust.

Former…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  3. Nairn v. BeanTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. HammelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. Handlan-Buck Company v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of County Road Commissioners v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Shepherd v. State Ex Rel. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. DunardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Public Water Supply District of Pemiscot County No. 1 v. FowlkesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Joe D. Esther, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API