Legal Opinion

Donnelly v. Brown, Winick, Graves, Gross, Baskerville, Schoenebaum, & Walker, P.L.C.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 9, 1999No. 97-1495PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

The plaintiff, John V. Donnelly, brought this declaratory judgment action against his former law firm to establish his right to retirement benefits under a membership agreement. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant firm, and the plaintiff appealed. We affirm.

I. Facts.

Donnelly has been an attorney in Des Moines since 1965, when he began to work for the predecessor to the defendant firm of Brown, Winick, Graves, Gross, Basker-ville, Schoenebaum and Walker, P.L.C. (Brown, Winick). He became a partner in 1968, and when the partnership became a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Miller v. Foulston, Siefkin, Powers & EberhardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. Spiegel v. Thomas, Mann & Smith, P.C.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Anderson v. Aspelmeier, Fisch, Power, Warner & EngbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  5. Pierce v. Hand, Arendall, Bedsole, Greaves & JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Of Iowa Vs. James Maximiliano OchoaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Schoonmaker v. Cummings & Lockwood of Connecticut, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Hoff v. Mayer, Brown and PlattAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Borteck v. RIKER, DANZIG, SCHERERSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  5. Borteck v. RIKER, DANZIGNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API