Legal Opinion

Miller v. Foulston, Siefkin, Powers & Eberhardt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 13, 1990No. 63,6271PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

ALLEGRUCCI, J.:

This is a civil action brought by the plaintiff, Malcolm Miller, against the law firm of Foulston, Siefkin, Powers & Eberhardt (Foulston-Siefkin) and his former partners. The plaintiff involuntarily left the firm under pressure, and, although he alleges ten separate claims in his petition, the basis of his action is that he should receive retirement benefits and a share of the attorney fees the firm received for its 20-year litigation in two sets of class action cases that have become known as the consolidated and the private helium…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Friends University v. W. R. Grace & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. Newton v. Hornblower, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. Bowen v. WesterhausSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Great Plains Trust Co. v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. Burcham v. Unison Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Schoonmaker v. Cummings & Lockwood of Connecticut, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Northern Natural Gas Company v. Ralph Grounds, Malcolm Miller, Movant-Appellant v. Foulston, Siefkin, Powers & EberhardtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Great Rivers Cooperative Of Southeastern Iowa v. Farmland Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API