Legal Opinion
Borteck v. RIKER, DANZIG
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 21, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
827 A.2d 1121 (2003)
362 N.J. Super. 284
Robert D. BORTECK, Esq., Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
RIKER, DANZIG, SCHERER, HYLAND & PERRETTI LLP, Defendant-Appellant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 18, 2003.
Decided July 21, 2003.
Glenn A. Clark, Morristown, argued the cause for appellant (Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, pro se; Mr. Clark and Charles F. Waskevich, Jr., of counsel; Mr. Clark, on the brief).
Robert Novack, Short Hills, argued the cause for respondent (Edwards & Angell, attorneys; Mr. Novack and Mary L. Moore, on the brief).
Before Judges SKILLMAN,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Schoonmaker v. Cummings & Lockwood of Connecticut, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Miller v. Foulston, Siefkin, Powers & EberhardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- Dwyer v. JungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Borteck v. RIKER, DANZIG, SCHERERSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004