Legal Opinion

People v. Pineda

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided August 14, 2017No. B267885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

*471A jury found defendant Armando Pineda, Jr. (defendant) guilty of second degree murder for shooting the patriarch of a neighboring family, *472Rogelio Islas (Rogelio).1 Defendant was 17 years old at the time of the crime, and the Los Angeles *271County District Attorney directly filed the charge against him in a court of criminal jurisdiction, rather than a juvenile court. Owing to that filing decision and the subsequent repeal of "direct file" procedures effected by Section 4 of the Public Safety and Rehabilitation Act of 2016 (Proposition 57), we must decide an issue pending on our Supreme Court's…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Tapia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. Brewer, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. People v. SuarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. People v. Suarez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API