Legal Opinion

City of Fredericksburg v. Bopp

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided November 5, 2003No. 04-02-00663-CVPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice.

In this appeal, the City of Fredericks-burg (the “City”) attempts to enforce a sign ordinance against Friedhelm Claus Bopp (“Bopp”). The City asserts five issues on appeal. We overrule the City’s issues, and conclude that we need not address Bopp’s cross-issues. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Background

Bopp owns and operates Friedhelm’s Bavarian Inn Restaurant and Bar in Fred-ericksburg. This property was owned by Bopp when it was annexed by the City. At the time of annexation, a free-standing pole sign advertising the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Truly v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Lenz v. LenzTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. City of Hutchins v. PrasifkaTexas Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Albert G. Hill, Jr. v. Shamoun & Norman, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Doncaster v. Hernaiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
  3. City of White Settlement v. Super Wash, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Dunnagan v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  5. TRUDY'S TEXAS STAR, INC. v. City of Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API