City of Fredericksburg v. Bopp
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice.
In this appeal, the City of Fredericks-burg (the “City”) attempts to enforce a sign ordinance against Friedhelm Claus Bopp (“Bopp”). The City asserts five issues on appeal. We overrule the City’s issues, and conclude that we need not address Bopp’s cross-issues. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Background
Bopp owns and operates Friedhelm’s Bavarian Inn Restaurant and Bar in Fred-ericksburg. This property was owned by Bopp when it was annexed by the City. At the time of annexation, a free-standing pole sign advertising the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Truly v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Lenz v. LenzTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Hutchins v. PrasifkaTexas Supreme Court · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Albert G. Hill, Jr. v. Shamoun & Norman, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Doncaster v. Hernaiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
- City of White Settlement v. Super Wash, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- Dunnagan v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- TRUDY'S TEXAS STAR, INC. v. City of Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.