Dunnagan v. Watson

OPINION

DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal concerns a dispute between Appellant and Cross-Appellee James R. Dunnagan (“Dunnagan”) 1 and Appellee and Cross-Appellant Joseph Earl Watson (‘Watson”), two members of a limited partnership who sued each other after repeated disagreements ensuing from activities associated with the limited partnership. After a trial, a jury found that Watson breached fiduciary duties that he owed to the limited partnership and that it was not practicable for the limited partnership to continue. In four issues, Dun-nagan, as appellant, complains that…