Legal Opinion
State v. Hall
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 1932PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McsKiNNey
The defendant was presented for violating chapter 51, section 7, Public Acts of 1931 (the general fish and game law), which is as follows:
“That the State Game Warden or the deputy game warden shall enforce all laws now enacted or that may be enacted for the protection, propagation and preservation of all wild animals, wild fowls, wild birds and fishes in this State, and shall prosecute all persons, firms, and corporations who shall violate any of such laws and he shall by himself or by his deputy game wardens seize any and all wild animals, wild fowls, wild birds and fishes or parts thereof…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lacoste v. Department of Conservation of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Paladini v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- State Ex Rel. Melton v. NolanTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- United States v. MulliganDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1920
- State v. LegoraTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Jamie Hamilton v. Gary T. Myers, Executive Director of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- State v. ShephardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Bowles v. Beatrice Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Shafer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.