Legal Opinion

State v. Legora

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1931PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

The State has appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Rutherford County quashing- an indictment. The second and third of the three counts-of the indictment were quashed because defective, in that ‘essential averments of fact were omitted. The first count was quashed upon the finding* by the court that the supporting-statute is unconstitutional. The statute is chapter 182 of the Acts of 1903, regulating- the business of junk dealers.

The action of the trial court on the second and third counts of the indictment is clearly correct and must be affirmed. These counts undertake to charge…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. City of Grand Rapids v. BraudyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Raine v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  4. City of St. Louis v. BaskowitzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  5. State v. CohenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Tennessee Scrap Recyclers Ass'n v. BredesenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Rust v. GriggsTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Bowles v. Beatrice Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  5. State v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API